AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

doc: clarify IWYU workflow

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Lőrinc

58/100 · Thin
doc: clarify IWYU workflow

Document the CI wrapper as the reproducible IWYU entrypoint instead of suggesting ad hoc native runs.
Also describe how to handle suspected false positives, explain when local `IWYU pragma` workarounds are appropriate, and add an example rationale to an existing pragma.

Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Pfeifer <daniel@pfeifer-mail.de>
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only updates developer documentation and adds a clarifying comment next to an existing code annotation. It does not change any executable code, network behavior, or security-sensitive logic.

Recommended action

No security action needed; this is a documentation-only change.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.