fuzz: doc: remove any mention to address_deserialize_v2
What changed, and why it matters
This commit is a documentation-only cleanup. It replaces an outdated example fuzz target name (address_deserialize_v2) with the current name (address_deserialize) in a user guide and a code comment. No executable code, logic, or security behavior is changed.
No action required. This is a non-security documentation update.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff modifies only strings inside doc/fuzzing.md and a comment in src/test/fuzz/fuzz.cpp. Both changes update the example fuzz target from address_deserialize_v2 to address_deserialize. There are no functional code changes, no bug fixes, and no security-relevant modifications.
Changed components
doc/fuzzing.mdsrc/test/fuzz/fuzz.cpp (comment only)Inspect captured patch +2 / −2
diff --git a/doc/fuzzing.md b/doc/fuzzing.md
index 564245b7..7564bbd7 100644
--- a/doc/fuzzing.md
+++ b/doc/fuzzing.md
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ of the test. Just make sure to use double-dash to distinguish them from the
fuzzer's own arguments:
```sh
-$ FUZZ=address_deserialize_v2 build_fuzz/bin/fuzz -runs=1 fuzz_corpora/address_deserialize_v2 --checkaddrman=5 --printtoconsole=1
+$ FUZZ=address_deserialize build_fuzz/bin/fuzz -runs=1 fuzz_corpora/address_deserialize --checkaddrman=5 --printtoconsole=1
```
## Fuzzing corpora
diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/fuzz.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/fuzz.cpp
index ec5b6384..d4d82695 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/fuzz.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/fuzz.cpp
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static std::vector<const char*> g_args;
static void SetArgs(int argc, char** argv) {
for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i) {
// Only take into account arguments that start with `--`. The others are for the fuzz engine:
- // `fuzz -runs=1 fuzz_corpora/address_deserialize_v2 --checkaddrman=5`
+ // `fuzz -runs=1 fuzz_corpora/address_deserialize --checkaddrman=5`
if (strlen(argv[i]) > 2 && argv[i][0] == '-' && argv[i][1] == '-') {
g_args.push_back(argv[i]);
}
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.