AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 33 Bitcoin

btcsignals: delete broken scoped_connection move assignment

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Thomas

73/100 · Adequate
btcsignals: delete broken scoped_connection move assignment

The defaulted move assignment overwrites m_conn without disconnecting
it first, so the previous callback stays registered with the signal and
keeps firing, violating the RAII contract:

btcsignals::scoped_connection sc0 = sig.connect(IncrementCallback);
btcsignals::scoped_connection sc1 = sig.connect(SquareCallback);
sc0 = std::move(sc1);
val = 3; sig(val); // both callbacks fire: 16 instead of 9

Move assignment is unused in the codebase, so delete it rather than
fixing it. It can be implemented properly if a use case arises.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit removes a broken move-assignment operator from a small helper class that manages automatic disconnection of signal callbacks. The broken operator could leave an old callback registered after a move, causing unexpected behavior. The commit states the operator is unused in the codebase, so it is deleted rather than fixed. There is no direct evidence this bug was exploitable for security harm.

Recommended action

No urgent action needed; the change is a defensive cleanup. If backporting, ensure downstream code does not rely on the deleted move assignment. Consider adding a regression test if the operator is ever re-implemented.

Security signals we found

01

RAII contract violation in scoped resource management

02

Potential use-after-move-like semantic bug (stale callback remains registered)

03

No input validation or memory corruption signals present

04

No evidence of attacker-controlled trigger path

Risk score

Why this scored 33/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 4/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.