AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

script/interpreter: introduce script_verify_flags typename

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Anthony Towns

73/100 · Adequate
script/interpreter: introduce script_verify_flags typename

Previously the SCRIPT_VERIFY_* flags were specified as either uint32_t,
unsigned int, or unsigned. This converts them to a common type alias in
preparation for changing the underlying type.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a pure code cleanup: it creates a single type name, script_verify_flags, and uses it everywhere script verification flags were previously written as uint32_t, unsigned int, or unsigned. The actual data type is still uint32_t, so behavior is unchanged. There is no security fix or vulnerability here.

Recommended action

No security action needed. Treat as normal refactoring; review only for build/test regressions.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.