AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

signals: remove boost::signals2 mentions in linters and docs

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Cory Fields

65/100 · Adequate
signals: remove boost::signals2 mentions in linters and docs

The documented example is no longer relevant, so remove it rather than updating
it to mention btcsignals.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a routine cleanup of documentation and a linting script. It updates an example in the developer notes to reference the project's own signal library (btcsignals) instead of the old Boost signals2 library, and removes three Boost signals2 header paths from the list of expected Boost includes checked by a linter. There is no code behavior change and no security relevance.

Recommended action

No security action needed. This is a documentation and lint-list maintenance commit.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.