AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#36213: Release: 32.0 translations update

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by merge-script

81/100 · Strong
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#36213: Release: 32.0 translations update

2c2667eaa9021cf98f6dc2e3e01eb0ee9c8e9288 qt: 32.0 translations update (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

This PR follows our [Release Process](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/fc4f35fdce4d65696be6bf34003dbcac1f2f64bf/doc/release-process.md) and concludes the translation-related work for this release cycle.

It is one of the steps required _before_ branch-off, as scheduled in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33607.

Previous similar PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34718.

**A note for reviewers:**
The actual translations on Transifex are a moving target. As a result, your diff after running [`bitcoin-maintainer-tools/update-translations.py`](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-maintainer-tools/blob/main/update-translations.py) may differ.

ACKs for top commit:
sedited:
ACK 2c2667eaa9021cf98f6dc2e3e01eb0ee9c8e9288

Tree-SHA512: 1b9fdb58733185031828cf46ad9044262ee84f29f98f41ce6990e533c8e835634c1c66ffcae8a938dc5e2df870048f7213f75160b1eb414555eb16c8df01b6e1
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a routine update of translated user-interface text for the Bitcoin Core Qt (graphical) wallet in preparation for the 32.0 release. It adds, removes, and reorders translated strings in many language files, and registers one new language (Latin, 'la') in the resource list. There are no code logic changes, no executable changes, and no security fixes or security-relevant behavior changes.

Recommended action

No security action needed. Treat as normal localization maintenance.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.