ci: updated docs to reflect removal of REPO_USE_WARP_RUNNERS flag
What the developer wrote
Authored by Max Edwards
ci: updated docs to reflect removal of REPO_USE_WARP_RUNNERS flag
What changed, and why it matters
This is a one-line documentation update in the CI README. It simply updates instructions for how to use third-party WarpBuild runners in a fork after a configuration variable was removed. There is no code change and no security relevance.
No security action needed. This is a routine documentation update.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The commit changes ci/README.md to replace outdated guidance referencing a REPO_USE_WARP_RUNNERS variable in .github/workflows/ci.yml with new guidance to replace bitcoin/bitcoin references with the fork’s org/repo name. It is purely a documentation change in the continuous integration setup.
Changed components
ci/README.mdInspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/ci/README.md b/ci/README.md
index 0b6a3446..33c623dc 100644
--- a/ci/README.md
+++ b/ci/README.md
@@ -97,5 +97,5 @@ To configure the primary repository, follow these steps:
When used in a fork the CI will run on GitHub's free hosted runners by default.
In this case, GitHub's cache size limitations may cause caches to be frequently evicted and missed, but the workflows will run (slowly).
-It is also possible to use your own WarpBuild Runners in your own fork with an appropriate patch to the `REPO_USE_WARP_RUNNERS` variable in ../.github/workflows/ci.yml
+It is also possible to use your own WarpBuild Runners in your own fork by replacing the references to `bitcoin/bitcoin` in `../.github/workflows/ci.yml` with the name of your fork (e.g. `your-org/bitcoin`).
NB that WarpBuild Runners only work at an organisation level, therefore in order to use your own WarpBuild Runners, *the fork must be within your own organisation*.
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.