AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 19 Bitcoin

contrib: Fix NameError in signet miner gbt()

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Torkel Rogstad

68/100 · Adequate
contrib: Fix NameError in signet miner gbt()

The logging.warning call referenced `bci["bestblockhash"]`, a variable
from the calling scope `do_generate()` that is not available inside the
`Generate.gbt()` method. This would crash with a NameError when
getblocktemplate returned a template based on an unexpected previous
block.

Use the `bestblockhash` parameter that was already being passed in and
used correctly in the comparison on the line above.

The bug was introduced in 7b31332370 when the gbt logic was extracted
into its own method — the if-condition was updated but the logging
call was not.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a small bug fix in a helper signet mining script. The script would crash with a NameError when it tried to log a warning about an unexpected previous block, because it referenced a variable that only existed in the calling function. The fix uses the correct variable that was already passed into the method. It is a straightforward coding mistake with no security exploit.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as a normal bug fix; merge if the project workflow requires it.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant signals present

02

Fixes a runtime exception (NameError) in a non-consensus utility script

03

No input validation, privilege escalation, or cryptographic issues

Risk score

Why this scored 19/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 9/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.