AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

refactor: use SignOptions for SignTransaction

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Sjors Provoost

57/100 · Thin
refactor: use SignOptions for SignTransaction
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a straightforward code cleanup change. It replaces a plain integer parameter for the signature hash type with a small options structure called SignOptions. All existing callers are updated to pass the same value inside the new structure. There is no change to what the code actually does or to any security behavior.

Recommended action

No security action needed. Treat as normal refactoring review.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.