doc: add 433 (Pay to Anchor) to bips.md
What the developer wrote
Authored by Sebastian Falbesoner
doc: add 433 (Pay to Anchor) to bips.md
What changed, and why it matters
This commit only updates a documentation file (doc/bips.md) to list that Bitcoin Core supports BIP 433 (Pay to Anchor) as of version 28.0. It does not change any executable code, network rules, or wallet behavior. There is no security issue here.
No action required. This is a documentation-only change.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff adds a single line to doc/bips.md noting that spending of BIP 433 Pay to Anchor (P2A) outputs is standard as of Bitcoin Core v28.0, referencing PR 30352. No source code, consensus logic, policy code, or build system is modified.
Changed components
doc/bips.mdInspect captured patch +1 / −0
diff --git a/doc/bips.md b/doc/bips.md
index 97645d0e..c814717a 100644
--- a/doc/bips.md
+++ b/doc/bips.md
@@ -73,3 +73,4 @@ BIPs that are implemented by Bitcoin Core:
* [`BIP 386`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0386.mediawiki): tr() Output Script Descriptors are implemented as of **v22.0** ([PR 22051](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22051)).
* [`BIP 387`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0387.mediawiki): Tapscript Multisig Output Script Descriptors are implemented as of **v24.0** ([PR 24043](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24043)).
* [`BIP 431`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0431.mediawiki): transactions with nVersion=3 are standard and treated as Topologically Restricted Until Confirmation as of **v28.0** ([PR 29496](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29496)).
+* [`BIP 433`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0433.mediawiki): Spending of Pay to Anchor (P2A) outputs is standard as of **v28.0** ([PR 30352](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30352)).
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.