AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 21 Bitcoin

lint: Require scripted-diff script to succeed

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Hodlinator

78/100 · Adequate
lint: Require scripted-diff script to succeed

Previous version of commit-script-check.sh would succeed as long as git diff succeeded.

Can be verified through adding a failing scripted diff commit such as:
git commit --allow-empty -m $'scripted-diff: foo\n\n-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-\nadsasd\n-END VERIFY SCRIPT-\n'
...and running...
cargo run --manifest-path ./test/lint/test_runner/Cargo.toml -- --lint=scripted_diff
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a small fix to a developer linting tool that checks whether automated 'scripted-diff' commits actually run their embedded scripts. Previously, if the script itself failed, the check could still report success because the success/failure logic depended only on whether the git diff command succeeded. The patch makes the script's own exit status required for the overall check to pass. This is a tooling bug, not a vulnerability in Bitcoin Core's network or wallet code.

Recommended action

No urgent action needed beyond normal review and merge. This is a low-risk lint tooling fix. Users running Bitcoin Core nodes or wallets are unaffected. Developers relying on scripted-diff checks should ensure the patched version is used in CI.

Security signals we found

01

Logic error in CI lint script allowed failing verification scripts to be reported as passing

02

Fix enforces that scripted-diff embedded scripts must succeed before diff comparison

03

No change to consensus, networking, wallet, or cryptographic code

Risk score

Why this scored 21/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 3/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 2/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.