AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 20 Bitcoin

ci: unconfine seccomp for i686 no IPC

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Lőrinc

100/100 · Strong
ci: unconfine seccomp for i686 no IPC

Docker 29.4.2 blocks `socketcall(2)` in the default seccomp profile:
https://docs.docker.com/engine/release-notes/29/#2942
https://github.com/moby/profiles/releases/tag/seccomp%2Fv0.2.2
https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/52501

That affects the `i686, no IPC` job because it runs 32-bit Linux test binaries inside Docker.

Add Docker's documented `--security-opt seccomp=unconfined` workaround to this job's `CI_CONTAINER_CAP` - the hook `ci/test/02_run_container.py` already appends to `docker run`.

This restores socket availability for the 32-bit test binaries throughout the job:
https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/seccomp/#run-without-the-default-seccomp-profile
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference✓ Names security-relevant behavior explicitly
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This change loosens a security sandbox only for one 32-bit Linux continuous-integration test job. Docker's newer default profile was blocking an old 32-bit system call used for sockets, causing the CI job to fail. The patch tells Docker not to apply its default seccomp filter to that container so the tests can run. It does not change Bitcoin Core code that end users run, and it does not appear to be a fix for a vulnerability in Bitcoin itself.

Recommended action

No user action required. Reviewers may confirm the CI job still needs this broad workaround or consider a narrower custom seccomp profile that only allows socketcall(2), but the change is acceptable as a documented upstream workaround for a test-only container.

Security signals we found

01

CI sandbox relaxation (seccomp=unconfined) for a single 32-bit test job

02

Change is confined to CI environment variables, not runtime node code

03

No mention of vulnerability, CVE, bug bounty, or security advisory in commit

04

Workaround for upstream Docker seccomp policy change affecting socketcall(2)

Risk score

Why this scored 20/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 9/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.