What changed, and why it matters
This commit adds a PGP public key and a signature file for a firmware release. It is a routine release attestation step, not a code change, and contains no security fix or vulnerability.
No action required; this is a normal release attestation commit.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The commit adds two files to the releases/ directory: assertion-psteiger.sig, a binary signature asserting the firmware-btc-v9.23.3 release, and psteiger.asc, a PGP public key for Patrick Steiger. There are no source code modifications, no bug fixes, and no security-relevant changes to the firmware or build system.
Changed components
releases/firmware-btc-v9.23.3/assertion-psteiger.sigreleases/pubkeys/psteiger.ascInspect captured patch +13 / −0
diff --git a/releases/firmware-btc-v9.23.3/assertion-psteiger.sig b/releases/firmware-btc-v9.23.3/assertion-psteiger.sig
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..38e6f6c
Binary files /dev/null and b/releases/firmware-btc-v9.23.3/assertion-psteiger.sig differ
diff --git a/releases/pubkeys/psteiger.asc b/releases/pubkeys/psteiger.asc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ada3000
--- /dev/null
+++ b/releases/pubkeys/psteiger.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
+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+=zYNZ
+-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.