AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 42 Bitcoin

Warn before truncated value displays

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by benma's agent

78/100 · Adequate
Warn before truncated value displays

Show the existing large-value warning before value confirmation bodies that exceed the UI label limit.

Apply it to shared message verification, Ethereum transaction and typed-data values, and BTC policy name/policy displays.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a warning screen to the BitBox02 hardware wallet whenever a long message or value is about to be shown in a truncated form. Previously, the device could silently cut off the end of very long transaction details, message data, or policy names, potentially hiding important information from the user before they approve an action. The fix shows a 'Warning: the next value is too large to display in full' screen first, so users know they are not seeing the complete content.

Recommended action

No immediate action needed; this is a defensive UX/security improvement. Users should ensure their device firmware is updated to a version containing this commit so that truncated values are preceded by a warning. Developers should continue to route all long-value confirmations through confirm_value() and keep MAX_CONFIRM_BODY_SIZE synchronized with MAX_LABEL_SIZE.

Security signals we found

01

UI truncation warning added before oversized confirmation bodies

02

Centralized body-size limit to keep Rust and C UI limits in sync

03

Replaced duplicated warning logic with shared confirm_value helper

04

Added unit tests for boundary behavior and per-line warnings

05

Affects transaction/message/policy approval flows where hidden trailing data could mislead users

Risk score

Why this scored 42/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 7/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 9/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.