AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

AGENTS: add review guidelines

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Marko Bencun

50/100 · Thin
AGENTS: add review guidelines

Document review guidance for removed function calls.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only adds two sentences of documentation to the project's AGENTS.md file, giving reviewers guidance on what to check when a function call is removed in a code change. It does not modify any firmware code, cryptographic logic, build scripts, tests, or configuration. There is no security issue in this change.

Recommended action

No action needed; this is a documentation-only commit with no security relevance.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.