What the developer wrote
Authored by Marko Bencun
fix unit test
Regression from e39367090.
What changed, and why it matters
This is a one-line change updating a public key value inside a unit test. It is not a security fix and does not change any production code. The commit message says it fixes a unit test regression from an earlier commit.
No security action needed. Treat as a normal test-maintenance commit.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff changes only a hardcoded expected public key in a Rust unit test for payment_request.rs. The old expected value (0309…32ff) is replaced with a new expected value (02bf…8a90d). No runtime firmware logic, cryptographic checks, or API behavior is modified. The change is consistent with updating a test expectation after a prior commit altered the underlying test data or derivation.
Changed components
src/rust/bitbox02-rust/src/hww/api/payment_request.rs (unit test only)Inspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/src/rust/bitbox02-rust/src/hww/api/payment_request.rs b/src/rust/bitbox02-rust/src/hww/api/payment_request.rs
index a247881..72fcc1f 100644
--- a/src/rust/bitbox02-rust/src/hww/api/payment_request.rs
+++ b/src/rust/bitbox02-rust/src/hww/api/payment_request.rs
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(swapkit_identity.name, "SWAPKIT");
assert_eq!(
swapkit_identity.public_key,
- hex!("03098cba9cde720171796a5c58cb774b0cd19deb62e9b51df5967aefeba34632ff")
+ hex!("02bf5740a2b794b33d73358d7313e9cb260058f3ac6c886fcc388d9f3f0b48a90d")
);
assert_eq!(find_identity("SWAPKIT Provider").unwrap().name, "SWAPKIT");
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.